Rumors are flying about Friday’s pep rally. We already know it will be at Notre Dame Stadium instead of the Joyce Center — the first time that’s happened since the Nebraska game in 2000, according to The Observer. But that’s not all. The Backer says “the campus is buzzing that Bon Jovi will be making an appearence for fellow Jersey native Charlie Weis.” The Backer doubts the Bon Jovi “buzz” is accurate, but he adds, “Definite word is someone big…is coming, and even Fr. Jenkins’s secretary doesn’t know who.” (That’s “someone big” in addition to Joe Montana and Lou Holtz, who will definitely be there, according to The Backer.)
At the law school, the “buzz” is focusing on another Jerseyite: Bruce Springsteen. At least, that’s what the SBA newsletter, the Patty O’Herald, is reporting — but it appears now that the O’Herald report is a joke, and the “Confirmed Gossip” about a Springsteen appearance is all gossip and no confirmation. Still, the rumors persist. Meghan points out that Springsteen’s tour schedule says he’ll be in Chicago on Thursday night and in Madison, Wisconsin on Saturday night — but he doesn’t have a concert scheduled for Friday night. Hmm… (Bon Jovi is apparently not on tour this month. See also here.)
So… will it be Bon Jovi? The Boss? Neither? Both? It’s anybody’s guess! (Though personally, I’m guessing “neither.”) But for what it’s worth, Lisa says the marching band will be playing both Jersey boys’ music at halftime Saturday. (But Kate says that’s long-planned.)
[UPDATE: It’s the Fog of Friday! Chris says Lou Holtz won’t be at the pep rally, and he has a link to back him up. Montana, he says, is “confirmed.” They’re saying this on NDNation, too (which might be where Chris is getting his info). … Over on NDToday.com, the rumors are flying faster than a Matt Leinart-to-Dwayne Jarrett touchdown pass. Meanwhile, on NDNation, they’ve having some fun with the whole thing: see, for example, here and here.]
In other news, the Chicago Tribune confirms earlier rumors that ESPN GameDay is coming to campus. In fact, they’re coming a day early:
ESPN…will dispatch “GameDay” commentators Chris Fowler and Lee Corso to South Bend on Thursday for a “SportsCenter” segment. ESPN2’s “Cold Pizza” will originate from an area between the stadium and the Hesburgh Library on Friday.“It’s always our goal to be right in the center of the activity,” ESPN spokesman Josh Krulewitz said. “Getting there Thursday gives us a chance to rev it up a little early.”
Bottom line… even assuming the Springsteen/Bon Jovi rumors are just that, it’s still going to be an absolutely insane weekend.
P.S. Mike at The Blue-Gray Sky calls Saturday’s showdown “the biggest game in 12 years” (harkening back, I presume, to the “Game of the Century” between #1 Florida State and #2 Notre Dame, which the Irish won by a touchdown), and is optimistically recalling the last time USC game to South Bend with an undefeated record, in 1995. (The Irish upset the #5 Trojans, 38-10, and students rushed the field.)
Sean at Kelly Green, however, is less optimistic: “I’m more horrified than ever” after the Trojans’ win over Arizona, he says. “If their defense doesn’t start to play with a sense of urgency, we may score 50 points on them. Unfortunately, 50 probably won’t be enough.” That, presumably, is based on his earlier analysis of the battle between the ‘SC Air Attack and the ND Pass Defense: “Sh*t… Advantage: Sh*t…” Heh.
Still, he says, “I haven’t been this excited about a football game in years” … but he ultimately predicts a 41-31 USC victory: “We just don’t have the horses on defense to contain Leinart (or Booty, or Sanchez for that matter). To win this game, the offense will have to be outstanding (likely), and the defense will have to force a few turnovers and limit SC to field goals a few times (not likely). I think we’ve got about a 10% shot of coming away with the win, which is exactly 10% higher than we would have been under Ty.”
|
Categories: Uncategorized
|
October 11th, 2005 at 10:49:07 am
Well, I do know that the band is playing Springsteen and Bon Jovi music for half time.
October 11th, 2005 at 10:50:28 am
And GameDay was here for the Nebraska game in 2000. I was there. And I think they have been here one other time too in the last 5 years, though I can’t remember when.
October 11th, 2005 at 10:50:52 am
Woohoo!!
WHOOOOA-OOOHHH!!! LIVIN’ ON A PRAYER!!!
I may not be able to sing along with the Victory March this week, but I’ll sing along with that. :)
October 11th, 2005 at 11:21:02 am
I think all sons and daughters of Troy will be “living on a prayer” by halftime.
haha
Go Irish!
October 11th, 2005 at 11:30:34 am
Gameday was there for Nebraska, and for a few other games when I was there. I just don’t remember which ones.
I’m kinda wishing I was there for this weekend. ;-)
October 11th, 2005 at 11:41:03 am
Yeah, I removed the part about it being the first visit since 1993, since that doesn’t appear to be true. Thanks. :)
October 11th, 2005 at 12:01:09 pm
The Boss…
Egad… I hope he slips on some beer!
Just kidding… SORTA
October 11th, 2005 at 12:18:20 pm
Here is what I have heard. 1) Lou Holtz will not be at the Pep Rally. He has a speaking engagement in Saginaw, MI. at 6:30pm on Friday ( http://baycitymichiganhomes.com/wwwroot/moladmin/articles/articledisplay.cfm?art_id=2500 ). However, Holtz will likely be on campus Saturday for the game. 2) Joe Montana is the confirmed speaker for the pep rally. He annoucned this on ESPN Radio about a month ago. 3) Tim Brown will also be on campus both Friday and Saturday. 4) Bruce Springsteen will be in Chicago on Thursday doing a show and then in Madison, WI. on Saturday, that does leave open the possibility of a stop in SB on Friday night. 5) Bon Jovi will be in Minneapolis on October 11 and then in Madison, WI. on Sunday the 16th. 6) Also, though I cannot confirm this from his website, I hear that Carrot Top will also be within 150 miles of SB this weekend.
October 11th, 2005 at 12:30:41 pm
I heard that William Shatner and the recently made-available Paris Hilton will be in Chicago this weekend. Wouldnt it be great if Lou Ferrigno could make it?
Come on, eye on the prize: Irish upset the Trojans on a last second field goal. Touchdown Jesus calls it…
October 11th, 2005 at 12:47:04 pm
I think we’ve got about a 10% shot of coming away with the win, which is exactly 10% higher than we would have been under Ty.
So under Ty, the chance ND wins would have been 9.09%? Or is my math off slightly?
If fUCLA goes undefeated, I bet you GameDay will be at the Coliseum again for the USC-fUCLA showdown. Can you imagine how huge that would be?
October 11th, 2005 at 12:49:45 pm
I think we’ve got about a 10% shot of coming away with the win, which is exactly 10% higher than we would have been under Ty.”
So very sad, can’t even acknowledge the hard work of the coach who put a team together that gave Weiss the opportunity to do so well this year.
The fickleness of fandom…
October 11th, 2005 at 12:52:44 pm
In my opnion it’s pretty worthless. For some reason the opposing team’s fans always think it is way cooler than any ND students ever do (notice the girl who can’t even remember when they had it), and in their quest to get on TV they just tear up all the sod out in front of Touchdown Jesus.
October 11th, 2005 at 1:18:11 pm
Let’s see now, ND’s big win against Pittsburgh. How has Pittsburgh done since that game?? Well they have only won 1 game against 1A teams and that was against Cincinnati….Their only other win was against 1AA Youngstown St. So they are overall 2-4 (if you count the Youngstown win.)
ND’s big win over Michigan….a team that is now just 3-3.
ND’s big win over Purdue….a team that is now just 2-3 with the 2 wins coming against Akron and Arizona.
ND’s other win was against Washington…a team that is 1-4.
Oh, and ND has never beaten a #1 USC team by the way. So I am still looking for a 4-peat….USC by 31.
October 11th, 2005 at 1:33:20 pm
Ha. The band is playing Springsteen at my suggestion from, like, August. They play “Living on a Prayer” at least once every season. The Springsteen appearance is a *total* rumor. Former student union board president Charlie Ebersol tried for years to get a Springsteen concert in the stadium to utter failure. Mary Ann and Kirsten have no better information than anyone else. Just get to the rally early to get good seats!
October 11th, 2005 at 1:57:44 pm
Why would Touchdown Jesus be calling for a last minute win based on a field goal? It seems to me that that particular incarnation might think another manner of scoring is more appropriate…
October 11th, 2005 at 2:01:28 pm
Field Goal John the Baptist?
October 11th, 2005 at 2:07:01 pm
Extra Point Joseph?
Two-Point Conversion Judas?
October 11th, 2005 at 2:15:15 pm
what I meant was that Touchdown Jesus would signal that the last-second field goal was good, not that he would call for a field goal. bad wording, I guess.
October 11th, 2005 at 2:46:09 pm
Just a random addition to the rumor mill, and I don’t have time to search through the Boston Globe for stories but there have been several over the years if your interested, but Bon Jovi is a very close friend of Bill Belicheck’s (I believe he was one of the first people he talked to after New England’s third superbowl) and through this relationship, I believe he and Weis became friends. I figure that adds some credence to the rumor.
October 11th, 2005 at 3:38:07 pm
Somehow the area between the library and the stadium doesn’t seem like the center of action at 7am. They’d be better off setting up outside the north/south dining hall, but then they won’t get the stadium in the background. (this rant applies to cold pizza only)
October 11th, 2005 at 4:53:20 pm
I heard Pope Ratzinger was coming to do a special blessing and to stick around to Cannonize Charlie Weis in case of a victory.
October 11th, 2005 at 5:10:14 pm
Heh.
October 11th, 2005 at 5:19:14 pm
boifromtroy - Weis would be “Cannonize”d only if he lost …
He might be canonised if he win, tho !
(shaking head)(or did I miss which team Weis coaches?)
October 11th, 2005 at 5:25:37 pm
I dunno, it would be tough to canonize Weis, unless he keeled over during the game. You do have to be dead first you know.
And Alasdair, canonize IS the correct spelling. There is no S, its a Z. If you are going to be an obnoxious spelling Nazi you might atleast be an accurate obnoxious spelling Nazi.
October 11th, 2005 at 5:54:15 pm
David, that would be “spelling Nasi” to you!
October 11th, 2005 at 6:12:40 pm
My inside sources were unable to confirm the validity of the Bon Jovi/Springsteen rumors. I’m pretty sure that rumors is all they are.
October 11th, 2005 at 6:55:15 pm
Well you can always hang around after the game to listen to the USC band playing their standard repertoire of victory music.
October 11th, 2005 at 7:32:13 pm
Brendan - as my official source of blog wisdom, are you able to instruct me as to the blog ASCII or emoticon for ‘high-five’ so that I can do it with boifromtroy (while, of course, sticking strictly to the family-friendly nature of this blog) ?
David - you can honor the spelling that works for you, just as *I* honour the spelling that *I* know to be correct rather than ex-colonial … you and I both agree that there is no justaposed “nn” in either canonised or in canonized …
Oh - and, eventually, you and I will both agree that it’s not “its a Z”, but, more correctly, its spelling should be “it’s an S” …
(innocent grin)
Yes, I know, we’re just having more of an its-picking interlude !
October 11th, 2005 at 8:30:41 pm
Well given that it comes from the Latin canonizare I’m going to have to go with the fact that you Brits/Scots/Eires have it wrong and not us Colonials. Sorry to break it to you old chap.
Oh and althought you may be “justaposed” to everything I say, you should know that the correct spelling is juxtaposed. I must admit though your constant placing of s’s has me wondering if you have some snake in you. Then I answer my question when I remember you are a Republican supporter :D
October 11th, 2005 at 9:56:09 pm
Ken, is correct, ND has never beaten a #1 ranked Southern Cal. But, of course, Ken would be committing a logical fallacy if he were to insinuate that because ND has never beaten a #1 USC that they never will.
But, I wouldn’t be surprised if Southern Cal kids aren’t able to grasp logic…if they could, they wouldn’t have received rejection lettes from the UCLA admissions office.
And, while we’re on the subject of UCLA, I think it’s worth noting, Andrew, that if UCLA wins and USC wins this weekend, the UCLA vs. USC game will ALMOST be as big as the ND v. USC game. Certainly for PAC-10 fans and USC fans the game will mean more…but not to the rest of the country, because neither team has Notre Dame’s national following. Where do you think this week’s hype is coming from?
As for Saturday’s game…we’re under no illusions. USC is, by far, the best team in college football. Their talent is amazing. And yes…I’ll admit it…Pete the Poodle is a good coach. Indeed, he’s a great coach.
We know this. But we ARE the Fighting Irish, a name which harkens back to history’s greatest underdog.
The boyos wearing the green on the Easter morning of 1916 knew they didn’t have a chance against their imperialist enemies, but they went down fighting nevertheless. And, of course “REMEMBER FONTENOY” (harkening back from an earlier age of Irish militarism)
Southern Cal is definately evil–they hail from that den of iniquity that you call Los Angeles. They’re chincy and sheik and all the rage in that materialistic, image-craven hell hole of a city.
According to Regis, a man with wisdom and foresight uneqaul and unmatched, Notre Dame “represents all that is good in this world.” For crying out loud, God wants us to win. As the Crusaders would say: “GOD WILLS IT” And God willing, Our Lady’s University will kick the ever living shit out of the very beatable Trojans (saracen/heathen), and send them packing with Matt Leinart’s dancing tutu between his legs
October 11th, 2005 at 10:11:07 pm
If God wants you to win, then why haven’t you won a bowl game in the last who knows how many years?
October 11th, 2005 at 10:15:51 pm
I’m willing to stake the claim that this blog has seen proof of at least a few USC grads capable of logic…
October 11th, 2005 at 10:40:14 pm
Mike–yes, that’s true, good point. The one USC grad with truly exceptional logic chose to go where for law school?….oh yeah, Notre Dame!
David, it is not for us mere mortals to question God’s plan–merely to accept it. On Saturday, Touchdown Jesus is going to step off of the mosaic, intercept a would-be Leinart TD pass, and run it back for a touchdown–he will then make his signature touchdown pose and receive a penalty for taunting
October 12th, 2005 at 12:05:35 am
It’s Touchdown Jezuz, don’t you know?!?
October 12th, 2005 at 12:53:14 pm
I’m pretty sure we beat ASU in front of Touchdown Beelzebub, so I don’t see why we can’t beat Touchdown Jesus too.
National following or not, a showdown between 11-0 USC and 10-0 fUCLA would be bigger than this weekend’s game. LA is the media capital of the world (NYC just pretends it is), and that story would dominate–especially with the Rose Bowl on the line.
October 12th, 2005 at 1:29:15 pm
Andrew, you need a reality check my friend. Let’s assume that Los Angeles (aka: Hell on Earth) is the media capital of the nation (which it assuredly is not), it is still NOT the football hub of the nation (the Trojans notwithstanding).
You might be shocked to hear this, but its pretty difficult to watch PAC-10 games in the heartland, the midwest, the southeast, or the east coast–because they’re not aired there. Even Southern Cal games, the defending champs, aren’t always aired.
Notre Dame on the other hand? Well, no need for me to remind you that Notre Dame games are nationally aired week in and week out. Sorry buddy, but the New York press isn’t going to be hyping the UCLA v. USC game–they have hyped ND v. USC…why? New York, like most parts of the country, has a Notre Dame following.
But, like I said…IF USC wins this weekend, and UCLA wins this weekend, the USC v. UCLA will be a bigger deal to USC fans than this game. Obviously, no doubt about that. It will be a bigger deal in LA and the West Coast than the USC v. ND game. But to the nation? Don’t think so.
By the way, this is all moot anyway, because USC is going to lose in the Bend this weekend.
October 12th, 2005 at 2:04:15 pm
As far as I am concerned, this is just another game…as important as Arizona or Stanford in our quest for a third consecutive National title…
October 12th, 2005 at 2:46:25 pm
Boi, right you are. Although, considering that this is a non-conference game against an oppenent with which you play yearly and share an historic rivalry with, I would imagine that it is, at least superficially, not “just another game.” Hence the media hype (along with ND’s top 10 ranking and national following)
October 12th, 2005 at 4:09:08 pm
Just another game.
Every game has the same level of importance put on it as USC-ND would have had 5 years ago.
October 12th, 2005 at 4:27:33 pm
Wow, I’ll admit that Notre Dame does have a national following, but to believe that an unbeaten USC and an unbeaten UCLA playing each other at the end of the season with national championship hopes on the line isn’t going to be a bigger deal than this game? Sorry don’t think so beef.
Sadly for either school, because it IS the last game there is no chance that they could end the season ranked 1 and 2, even though they might be the best two teams in the country at that point. What if USC and UCLA are the last two unbeaten teams in the country? Everyone else has atleast one loss. There is a case to be made that they should be 1 and 2 because the one lost to the other, but a bowl game rematch is unlikely in that case no matter what.
After this week USC will still be undefeated and Notre Dame will have its second of what will likely become 3 or 4 losses for the season. All the Touchdown Jesus’s in the world won’t help you get to the Rose Bowl with those two losses, sorry beef.
October 12th, 2005 at 5:05:42 pm
How much national-media hype the USC-UCLA game gets will depend largely on how important, for the national championship picture, the Big 12 and SEC championship games (which are that same day) are. If USC and UCLA are the only national-championship contenders in action that day, there is absolutely no doubt that that game will get more hype than the USC-ND game… you’d have to be a blind, deaf and dumb Domer to think otherwise. But if, say, undefeated Alabama is playing undefeated Georgia for the SEC title that same day, that game will get the lion’s share of the media attention, and thus arguably the USC-ND game will have gotten more hype (because it is the biggest game on the national radar this weekend).
October 12th, 2005 at 6:25:56 pm
Brendan, I agree with you to an extent.
In 1993, #2 Notre Dame (9-0) hosted #1 Florida State (9-0), for a game billed “the game of the century.” The hype was unbelievable. Indeed, it was very close to the hype of this game.
I’m sorry, but to say that UCLA v. USC will eclipse the hype of this game is ridiculous. The defending champs playing a top 10 team, that just so happens to be a historic rival, that has a national following, that just so happens to be having a resurgent year, under a new coach, who has received hype all year…I’m sorry, but this game has all but maxed out hype potential. The next level of hype is: “game of the century.” UCLA v. USC will not be a “game of the century.”
October 12th, 2005 at 6:28:56 pm
David,
Your post has no credibility whatsoever, because you think it “likely” that ND will lose three OR FOUR more games. One or two? Yeah, USC and Tennessee will be tough. (personally, I think TN is overrated) (and USC will be more than tough). But three or four? That’s just stupid
October 12th, 2005 at 6:42:00 pm
Oh c’mon, Navy is due for a win. :)
October 12th, 2005 at 7:12:31 pm
Beef, imagine it’s the morning of December 3, and the Top 3 teams in the nation are #1 USC, #2 Virginia Tech, and #3 UCLA. All three are undefeated, and they’re the only undefeated teams left. Virginia Tech sewed up its Rose Bowl berth a week ago by ending its regular season with a win over North Carolina.
Texas, which dropped way down in the polls after its stunning loss to Colorado in the only Oct. 15 game to have an actual impact on the national-championship race :), has climbed back to #5 — and, because it beat Texas Tech and all the other teams in the Big 12 South, gets to go to the Big 12 championship anyway, for a rematch with Colorado. But with one loss and three undefeateds above it, Texas is out of the Rose Bowl picture, even with a win.
The SEC championship game is equally meaningless for the national championship picture, as it pits #4-ranked, 10-1 Auburn (which stunned previously undefeated Alabama two weeks ago to earn the SEC West title) against the Cinderella story of the year, 9-2 Vanderbilt, which confounded all the pundits by running the table in the SEC East and is now ranked in the Top 10 for the first time ever. [Just having a little fun, people…]
And in the ACC (forgot to mention that one before), it’s giant-killer Boston College, which knocked off both of the league’s previously undefeated teams (Virginia Tech and Florida State) in November, against Miami. It should be a fine matchup, as both teams are 10-1 and ranked in the Top 10, but again… it’s meaningless for the national championship picture.
Everyone wants to know whether Vanderbilt can complete its amazing run with an SEC championship win over Auburn. Everyone wants to know if Texas can avenge its loss to Colorado. And everyone wants to know which former Big East team will win the ACC crown.
But everyone knows there is really only one important game today.
Ever since Alabama’s loss to Auburn two weeks ago, it’s been crystal-clear that the “Battle of Los Angeles” will determine who gets to go to the national champiponship game. This intense but local rivalry, which rarely gets much attention outside of southern California, has instead been the talk of the nation for two weeks. Is UCLA really this good, or are they just the beneficiaries of a weak Pac 10? Can Karl Dorrell match wits with Pete Carroll? Can the Bruin secondary slow Matt Leinart, the consensus favorite for his second consecutive Heisman after passing for 568 yards against Notre Dame and following it up with a series of equally dazzling performances throughout the rest of the season?
Which team will get a spot in the Rose Bowl and a shot at Virginia Tech? Will it be the Bruins or the Trojans?
Game of the century? Perhaps not. But bigger and more-hyped than a major midseason rivalry game, in which only one of the two teams is undefeated and the difference in the rankings is not 1 vs. 2, not 1 vs. 3, but 1 vs. 9? Absolutely.
This is a very, very, very big game. But it’s getting blown out of proportion in the minds of many Domers. The USC-UCLA game under the circumstances I just described (you can substitute a more realistic SEC East champ than Vanderbilt if you like :) would obviously be bigger. It would effectively be a national semifinal game, and a rivalry to boot, rather than just a relatively run-of-the-mill Top 10 showdown that is made huge by the rivalry.
October 12th, 2005 at 8:12:55 pm
Brendan, one quibble: In your scenario above, you say Va Tech is #2 and already has a Rose Bowl berth wrapped up. But if fUCLA is #3 and undefeated, doesn’t it stand to reason that #2 Va Tech is undefeated also? If Va Tech is undefeated, then your sentence “…it’s giant-killer Boston College, which knocked off both of the league’s previously undefeated teams (Virginia Tech and Florida State) in November….” doesn’t make sense.
Just sayin’. ;-)
October 12th, 2005 at 8:33:05 pm
Brendan, a more likely scenario is this:
#2 Texas wins out and faces an 8-3 Colorado team in the Big 12 title game. Everyone collectively yawns, since the Buffs already got killed by Texas on 10/15, and nobody expects this game to be much closer.
Meanwhile, in the SEC, Florida beats Georgia and goes to the SEC title game to face Auburn, which beat Alabama a couple weeks prior (LSU is knocked out after having lost to Florida on 10/15). Interesting matchup, but no national title is on the line.
And in the ACC, Va Tech loses to Miami, but BC doesn’t (giving Miami two ACC losses), meaning a one-loss Va Tech goes to the title game to face a one-loss Florida State team (which lost to Florida a couple weeks earlier). Again, a big game, but the Rose Bowl isn’t on the line.
Finally, you have an undefeated and #3 fUCLA coming into the Coliseum hoping to upset the #1 Trojans and stay home to face Texas in the national championship game. Then, yes, that game would be huge, and everyone would be paying attention.
October 12th, 2005 at 9:19:16 pm
Oops! I messed up the Virginia Tech part of the scenario… cuz I forgot they were in the ACC… heh…
October 12th, 2005 at 9:27:34 pm
Brendan, I completely understand your point. My point is: this game IS NOT being hyped as a mid-season rivalry game. This game is being hyped WELL above that level.
Here’s a perfect example of how big the hype is: tix for the USC v. ND game are selling for higher prices than tix for either of the MLB Championship Series. Room-rates in South Bend are going for $500 per night! And that’s at the mid-range hotels–which, incidentally, require two night stays!
So yes, which game will be more important–well, if USC wins this weekend and UCLA wins…the USC v. UCLA game will be more important. And it will be majorly hyped. It’s just that major hype is precisely what you’re getting here. It can’t possibly be hyped more, because this game is being OVERhyped. So, barring a “game of the century,” I don’t see that game generating MORE excitement
October 13th, 2005 at 10:12:29 am
thebeef
I suggest you enroll in an Reading course at some other college, because obviously the Notre Dame courses aren’t helping you much. Here is what I said:
After this week USC will still be undefeated and Notre Dame will have its second of what will likely become 3 or 4 losses for the season.
Now please explain to me where in that sentence I said they will have 3 or 4 MORE losses this season?
Yeah thats what I thought.
So basically its YOU who lack the credibility here not me. Nice try though.
October 13th, 2005 at 12:57:52 pm
beef, again, nothing you said indicates that this rivalry is back to where it should be. It merely indicates that South Bend and the Notre Dame faithful are starting to believe in their team again.
March 3rd, 2007 at 4:34:58 am
Omaggio a Bon Jovi
Sarà il giornalista Antonello de Pierro, direttore di Italymedia.it e noto conduttore radiofonico di Radio Roma a presentare sabato 17 marzo 2007 presso Stazione Birra a Morena (Roma) alle ore 22.00, con l’esibizione degli Shock Rock Band: http://www.shockrockband.com (official italian Bon Jovi Tribute), il Bon Jovi celebration, per festeggiare insieme a tutti i fans + di 20 anni di carriera della straordinaria band americana che ancora richiama migliaia di persone sugli spalti provocando emozioni Il gruppo piacentino chiama a raccolta tutti i fans del cowboy del New Jersey per una serata tributo, evento unico nel suo genere per unire i supporter bonjoviani della capitale e di tutta Italia. Il locale, rinomato palcoscenico romano x live performance, verra’ allestito a tema e dedicherà l’intera serata live al Bon Jovi Celebration, in attesa del nuovo album previsto per la primavera, seguira’ discoteca per coloro che vorranno trattenersi. Consigliato look country e tanto entusiasmo e partecipazione!!
costo del biglietto € 5,00 compresa consumazione e proseguimento della serata.
per prenotare la propria partecipazione scrivere a : bonjovicelebration@gmail.com oppure chiamare al 3343861171.